Use of cookies
Cookies help us to provide our services. By using our website you agree that we can use cookies. Read more about our Privacy Policy and visit the following link: Privacy Policy
In April 2019 the Bundeskartellamt published the results of its sector inquiry into comparison websites. The Bundeskartellamt had first surveyed around 150 and then, in a second step, the 36 most relevant comparison websites from the travel, energy, insurance, telecommunications and financial sectors. The issues covered included cooperation between comparison websites, market coverage, how search results are ranked, other factors influencing consumers’ choice and the handling of user reviews. In some cases consumers were misled, transparency obligations were violated or advertisements were not labelled as such.
How useful a comparison is depends on the extent to which it covers the relevant market. Any players that are not taken into account will not be part of the comparison. While comparison websites are very good at covering the market in some sectors, comparisons for the insurance and hotel industries, in particular, left out some of the key providers. Only some websites made this important information sufficiently transparent for consumers, for example by providing a negative list.
In some cases the amount of commission paid by the different providers influenced their position in the ranking (for example, in hotel rankings). Consumers may find this misleading, even if the website includes general or hidden information about the fact that the amount of commission paid has an impact on the ranking results. In the energy sector, in particular, some websites did not include certain offers in their initial rankings because they did not receive a commission from the providers. Comparison websites for energy and telecommunication tariffs often displayed selected offers above the actual ranking (“position 0”). In some cases the providers paid for this position, and consumers were not informed that the offers displayed in this position were in fact advertisements.
Sometimes the websites provided misleading information about product availability, benefits or exclusive offers. This may have put consumers under pressure or raised false expectations, especially in the travel sector, but also in other industries.
In the sectors examined, user reviews were generally only written by users who had successfully concluded a transaction via the website. This helped prevent fake reviews, but on the other hand also reduced the range of reviews.
In all the sectors analysed, comparison websites cooperated with each other in terms of databases and calculator tools. Such cooperation can help to increase the number of comparison options available to consumers, but it can also mislead consumers into interpreting identical results on several supposedly independent websites as confirmation of the recommendations.
How to use comparison websites
The Bundeskartellamt has released a video sharing valuable tips on how to use comparison websites (in German only).